By Alessandro Verdoliva
Mr. Verdoliva studied international relations in Bologna and specialized in African Studies, criminal deviation and applied microeconomics (Game theory applied to foreign policy). He then went on to study economics in Milano and thereafter started working on systems of government in Rome with a focus on geopolitics and military studies.
Mr. Verdoliva has written almost 200 articles, from newspapers to research papers. He has a podcast, which can be found on Spotify dealing with foreign policy, international law, international relations and geopolitics. He is currently writing two books on political theory.
Alessandro has collaborated with several law firms in Italy and is a civil mediator in court.
The accusation focuses on the alleged disproportionality of Israel’s response to Palestinian attacks, positing an exaggerated number of Palestinian casualties compared to the number of Israeli casualties caused initially.
The accusation focuses on the alleged disproportionality of Israel’s response to Palestinian attacks, positing an exaggerated number of Palestinian casualties compared to the number of Israeli casualties caused initially.
The accusation focuses on the alleged disproportionality of Israel’s response to Palestinian attacks, positing an exaggerated number of Palestinian casualties compared to the number of Israeli casualties caused initially.
The accusation focuses on the alleged disproportionality of Israel’s response to Palestinian attacks, positing an exaggerated number of Palestinian casualties compared to the number of Israeli casualties caused initially.
This accusation is undoubtedly the most utilized and favored, especially by the most extremist factions which unfortunately constitute today. It does not aim to incriminate Israel’s actions but rather its very existence. While a similar narrative would have previously been dismissed as evidently flawed and confined to fringe social centers, it now requires refutation.